Which outcome is NOT directly related to limiting APRN authority?

Limiting the authority of Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) typically leads to several challenges within the healthcare system, and among those, enhanced emergency care response does not directly relate to this limitation. The primary impact of restricting APRN authority is often reflected in factors that contribute to reduced access and increased delays in healthcare services.

Increased wait times for patients can occur because fewer providers are available to meet the demand for services, leading to longer periods before patients can be seen. Higher overall healthcare expenditures can arise due to the necessity of involving more expensive physician resources rather than utilizing the cost-effective services of APRNs. Limited patient choices occur as patients may find fewer options available for the type of care they can receive, particularly in areas where APRN services could help alleviate shortages.

In contrast, enhancing emergency care response typically involves different strategies that focus on improving efficiency and resource allocation within ER settings rather than the scope of practice of APRNs. Emergency departments function under specific protocols that are often governed by laws and regulations, and while APRNs can play a role in such environments, the direct correlation between APRN authority and emergency response efficiency is not as clear-cut. Therefore, enhanced emergency care response is generally seen as a separate issue not directly tied to the limitations placed on